1. If there are different classes of people, "though leaders", idealists/fundamentalist, and the uneducated/pragmatists, how would they respond differently to news?
2. Why would anyone (including the uneducated and the "though leaders") think that this "news adulting" is a good idea?
3. Can "learning to read the news" be truly fun or attractive? Or is it just elitist nonsense that reasonable people should just ignore, and completely give up on news?
4. What are the predicted difference in psychometrics between different classes? g-factor (intelligence/openness)? p-factor (instability/neuroticism)? d-factor (sociopathy/disagreeableness)?
Here are some fun counter-questions:
1. If there are different classes of people, "though leaders", idealists/fundamentalist, and the uneducated/pragmatists, how would they respond differently to news?
2. Why would anyone (including the uneducated and the "though leaders") think that this "news adulting" is a good idea?
3. Can "learning to read the news" be truly fun or attractive? Or is it just elitist nonsense that reasonable people should just ignore, and completely give up on news?
4. What are the predicted difference in psychometrics between different classes? g-factor (intelligence/openness)? p-factor (instability/neuroticism)? d-factor (sociopathy/disagreeableness)?